Never trust a reporter and never believe the liberal media (Update)

Update at bottom.

I’ve been researching a little bit on the author of the Rolling Stones article on General McChrystal,

He’s clearly a left-leaning, progressive, probably democrat, person who does not care much for republicans, almost to the point of revulsion.  He was assigned to several campaigns during this past election, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani, who he has a particular distaste for, John McCain, and most importantly, Hillary Clinton.

This is his own account of the campaigns he covered.

I’ll bet you anything he was feeding the Obama campaign every little tidbit he could come up with. And if you have wondered how Obama knew so much about the inside of the Clinton campaign, here’s the answer.

McChrystal had a civilian communications specialist assigned to him named Duncan Boothby. He’d been there about a year, well within a time span to have been hand-picked himself.  Boothby resigned immediately after this story broke, I believe on Tuesday, even before McChrystal suffered his fate.

My thoughts are that it was Boothby who cleared Hastings and probably Boothby who was the source of most of the comments attributed to a “close aide or adviser.”

It just all stinks to high heaven. It’s not as if McChrystal called a news conference and disrespected civilian leaders. No, this little reporter ingratiated himself to the group and followed them around, hoping they would get drunk and “loosen up.” Maybe all reporters do this sort of thing, which is why I would not trust one EVER. But he seems extra slimy to me.

So Duncan Boothby authorized Hastings, but who contacted Boothby about it?  Just say, if the administration wanted for some reason to get McChrystal out, what better person than someone like Mr. Hastings who had proved himself in the past (as during the campaign).

So they get him in there, he picks up any dirt he can find or dig up, write up the story as if it were McCrystal who said all the things himself, and publish it in Rolling Stone magazine.

But, and here’s the important part, before it comes out, coordinate with the “state” media as to how to pick out certain phrases and play them up, ruin the man even before the story is in print.  Get it done and imbedded in everybody’s mind before they can read the article themselves and find out that most of the statements were actually said by someone else.  Somebody tells you what somebody else said, this is called hear-say.

It just fits together so perfectly.  But why did they want Patraeus in that spot?  Maybe to set him up for failure, seeing as how he was Bush’s guy?

Then, on the other hand, some believe the General set it up himself in order to get out of his assignment.

Either way, somebody set it up.  This was not just the normal course of events.

But the way the media isolates words, using them to smear a person the way they are experts at doing just has to stop.  They should not have this power.  I mean, who hasn’t said something about their boss or someone they don’t care for, or who they are disappointed with in an unguarded moment, and especially if drinking in a social, casual setting.

Just be sure there’s no reporter with a tape recorder and a pad anywhere within hearing distance, one with a plan and an agenda.

Never trust a reporter.

UPDATE:  A few hours ago I read a story by Washington Post and I should have taken a screen shot of it, but I didn’t.  I wanted to go back to it just now and it is almost impossible to find it in any search machine.  Finally did locate it but the headline has been changed, and I don’t know how much of the story line.  There was a woman reporter the first time.  Now her name is there and another name is added.  So obviously somebody got to them and they changed it.

It said basically that the reporter violated their off the record conversations.  The new headline waters it down to say that there is a disagreement between the McChrystal sources and the editor of the Rolling Stone.

They “fact-checked” by sending a list of questions.  Here’s a take away example.

In the last question, the fact-checker asked: “Did Gen. McChrystal vote for President Obama? (The reporter tells me that this info originates from McChrystal himself.)”

Boothby replied in all capitals. “IMPORTANT — PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE THIS — THIS IS PERSONAL AND PRIVATE INFORMATION AND UNRELATED TO HIS JOB. IT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE TO SHARE.” He went on to describe the “strict rules” under which military personnel keep their political views to themselves.

In the article, Hastings reported that the general “had voted for Obama.”

Bates said that the remark was “absolutely” not off the record, and he noted that Boothby’s appeal “isn’t on accuracy or even that it was off the record,” but that it was irrelevant. He said the magazine, like other news organizations, had no obligation to warn sources that they had made unwise remarks.

Boothby absolutely begged them not to print who McChrystal voted for and they did it anyway.  Low down.

I guess they won’t talk to a slimy reporter again, huh.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/06/25/AR2010062504087.html

30 questions:  http://hotair.com/archives/2010/06/25/pentagon-official-rolling-stone-made-mcchrystals-staff-think-they-were-speaking-off-the-record/

Posted:  06.25.10  Updated: 06.25.10 @ 11:15p.m.

15 Comments

Filed under Barack Obama, Human Interest, Media, patriotism, politics, President Barack Obama, Uncategorized

15 responses to “Never trust a reporter and never believe the liberal media (Update)

  1. Bella,

    I think McChrystal wanted out, which would make even a bigger stink in the media.

    I think the Obama administration had different narratives to pick from, depending on what everyone involved decided the course of action should be. I think if McChrystal had wanted to stay on The President would have given a butt covering speech for McChrystal. The bigger story is McChrystal was frustrated with the Civilian side he had to work with in Afghanistan. He knows what’s going on – on the ground. At least this has the Media Spot Light back on Afghanistan.

    I was watching Laura Ingraham last night on Bill O’Reilly she brought up. “Why isn’t anyone paying attention to what McChrystal said” He said Holebrooke and Eikenberry were the problem……McChrystal is gone but nothing has been done to address them and their performance re Afghanistan.

    I agree with you about Michael Hastings, and Rolling Stone, they wanted to effect a change in policy per Afghanistan War. They got out maneuvered pretty easily by the President. The policy stays the same, and The President had a back up thank God. Barack Obama has more to worry about from the Left than he does the Right.

    I am not Pro nation building in Afghanistan. BUT you don’t knee cap a Commander in the field, during a shooting war in the middle of a surge. Rolling Stone may be the current darling of the Left right now, but it’s not ever going to get access to Obama’s administration or the Pentagon again.

    I support the President’s decision in Afghanistan because what else can we do with a Nuclear Armed Pakistan – The Taliban and Al Qeada would love to get their hands on Nuclear weapons.

    • Catherine

      Do you people not want a free press? Go live in Communist China. The article is accurate. Sorry it doesn’t further your political agenda. Really, if you don’t want free speech, take a hike. There are lots of countries where your anti-journalism views would be welcome. So long and good luck.

      • bellalu0

        What are you talking about? Sounds like you’re the one that doesn’t want free speech.

        We are having a discussion – you know, the free exchange and expression of ideas and opinions.

        http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mayhill-fowler/seduction-and-betrayal-mc_b_625271.html

      • Catherine

        What am I talking about? Read the headline that says never trust a reporter and don’t believe the “liberal media.” Even if a story is 100 percent accurate, it is not to be believed or trusted. Ignorant.

      • bellalu0

        Catherine – I don’t need to read the title. What does Communist China have to do with it? A little extreme don’t you think? You don’t know for certain if the story is accurate or not. There seems to be some holes in it, and I don’t think the reporter is all that reliable. No, I would not trust a reporter, and I NEVER believe the liberal media.

        I’m not going to call you ignorant, as you did me.

    • Catherine

      Let me guess — you have never been a paid, working journalist. Your post is rife with theories and agendas that you dreamed up on your own, and yes, it sounds laughably ignorant, and it’s the type of missive that is prevalent among blogger hobbyists with too much time on their hands and a computer. The link you sent was another amateur who stole her lead from Janet Malcolm. Not that you know who Janet Malcolm is. I don’t normally spend time on these sites; I got sucked in, and now I’m gone.

  2. bellalu0

    If Obama were not president today, he would be undermining efforts in Afghanistan and anywhere else. He got his major claim to fame by making that “peace” speech at an anti-war rally in Chicago – the one he made that he got credit for as being against the war in Iraq. Of course, he was not in the Senate at the time the vote on Iraq took place, but if he had been he probably would have either voted for it or not voted at all.

    And he did not even vote to condemn the Betray Us ad from his friends at MoveOn.org.

    Whatever happened here, you can be sure he’s only concerned about how it affects him and his thin skin.

    Afghanistan is Obama’s chosen war and McChrystal was his chosen commander.

  3. bellalu0

    Gads — This is not a Google blog site and GOOGLE just put an ad on my blog without me knowing it.

    I just deleted it but what is going on?

  4. melsg

    Off topic but I just read the police statement from Al Gore’s massage therapist and I need a shower! Ewwwww. What a pig!

  5. melsg

    Yikes, check out the details on Dodd & Frank’s bill on drudge.

  6. Bella

    Google put an ad on your page? That’s weird.

  7. Red State Update “Obama You Can’t Play Afghanistanville If You UnFriend Your General”

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2010/06/red-state-update-obama-you-cant-play.html

  8. Mr Olbermann, I Have A Friday Night Book Request.

    Keith Olbermann Fridays With Thurber.

    http://youhavetobethistalltogoonthisride.blogspot.com/2010/07/keith-olbermann-fridays-with-thurber.html

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s